GPRFM Indicators
Scores by Dimension
Overall Indicator Score
GRPFM–1 Gender impact analysis of budget policy proposals
D
Notes:
GRPFM–1.1 Gender impact analysis of expenditure policy proposals
D
Notes:
The Lviv City Government does not analyse proposed changes to expenditure policies with gender impact.
GRPFM–1.2 Gender impact analysis of revenue policy proposals
D
Notes:
The Lviv City Government does not analyse proposed changes of revenue policies with gender impact.
GRPFM–2 Gender responsive public investment management
D
Notes:
GRPFM–2.1 Gender responsive public investment management
D
Notes:
The Lviv City Government does not analyse the impact of major public investment projects on gender as part of the economic analysis of investment proposals.
GRPFM–3 Gender responsive budget circular
D
Notes:
GRPFM–3.1 Gender responsive budget circular
D
Notes:
The Lviv City Government budget circular for FY2021 does not require key spending units to provide information on gender impact of budget policies.
GRPFM–4 Gender responsive budget proposal documentation
D
Notes:
GRPFM–4.1 Gender responsive budget proposal documentation
D
Notes:
The Lviv City Government’s medium-term strategic document as well as the annual budget documentation do not provide an overview of its policy priorities for improving gender equality. Also, there are no details of budget measures aimed at strengthening gender equality, nor an assessment of the impacts of budget policies on gender equality.
GRPFM–5 Sex-disaggregated performance information for service delivery
D
Notes:
GRPFM–5.1 Sex-disaggregated performance plans for service delivery
D
Notes:
Key spending units under the City Government of Lviv publish information on performance plans for service delivery, but the information does not include sex-disaggregated data on planned outputs for service delivery or a framework of performance indicators in relation to service delivery outputs or outcomes.
GRPFM–5.2 Sex-disaggregated performance achieved for service delivery
D
Notes:
Key spending units publish the performance achieved for service delivery, but at this stage, the information is not disaggregated according to sex.
GRPFM–6 Tracking budget expenditure for gender equality
D
Notes:
GRPFM–6.1 Tracking budget expenditure for gender equality
D
Notes:
There is no tracking of budget expenditures for gender equality.
GRPFM–7 Gender responsive reporting
D
Notes:
GRPFM–7.1 Gender responsive reporting
D
Notes:
The Lviv City Government publishes annual financial reports but the reports do not include specific gender-related expenditures. The reports also do not include the impact of budget policies on gender equality.
GRPFM–8 Evaluation of gender impacts of service delivery
D
Notes:
GRPFM–8.1 Evaluation of gender impacts of service delivery
D
Notes:
Key spending units under the Lviv City Government conduct and publish evaluations of the effectiveness and efficiency of their service delivery performance. However, the evaluations do not include an assessment of gender impacts of service delivery.
GRPFM–9 Legislative scrutiny of gender impacts of the budget
D
Notes:
GRPFM–9.1 Gender-responsive legislative scrutiny of budgets
D
Notes:
There is no review of gender impacts of service delivery programmes. The budget proposals submitted to the City Council have no specific gender-related expenditure policies and proposals.
GRPFM–9.2 Gender responsive legislative scrutiny of audit reports
NA
Notes:
This dimension is not applicable; external audit reports are not submitted to the City Council (local parliament).