GPRFM Indicators
Scores by Dimension
Overall Indicator Score
GRPFM–1 Gender impact analysis of budget policy proposals
D
Notes:
GRPFM–1.1 Gender impact analysis of expenditure policy proposals
D
Notes:
The Government of Chernivtsi City does not analyse proposed changes to expenditure policies with information that affects both males and females.
GRPFM–1.2 Gender impact analysis of revenue policy proposals
D
Notes:
Presently, the City Government of Chernivtsi does not analyse proposed changes of revenue policies with information that has an impact on gender.
GRPFM–2 Gender responsive public investment management
D
Notes:
GRPFM–2.1 Gender responsive public investment management
D
Notes:
Currently, the local government of Chernivtsi does not analyse the impact of major public investment projects on gender as part of the economic analyses of investment proposals.
GRPFM–3 Gender responsive budget circular
C
Notes:
GRPFM–3.1 Gender responsive budget circular
C
Notes:
The annual budget circular issued by the City Government Finance Office for FY2020 required each budget institution to provide information on gender impact of their budget policies and expenditure proposals, but there is no specific requirement to analyse sex-disaggregated data on planned outputs and outcomes for service delivery.
GRPFM–4 Gender responsive budget proposal documentation
D
Notes:
GRPFM–4.1 Gender responsive budget proposal documentation
D
Notes:
The City Government’s medium-term strategic documents as well as annual budget documentation do not specifically mention or provide an overview of its policy priorities for improving gender equality. Furthermore, there are no details of budget measures aimed at strengthening gender equality, nor assessment of the impacts of budget policies on gender equality.
GRPFM–5 Sex-disaggregated performance information for service delivery
B
Notes:
GRPFM–5.1 Sex-disaggregated performance plans for service delivery
B
Notes:
Currently, the departments of education and culture are the only two departments, with a cumulative budget of about 56% of the total city budget, which provide and publish sex-disaggregated information on planned outputs of service delivery for the forthcoming year; information for FY2020 and FY2021 are published on their respective websites.
GRPFM–5.2 Sex-disaggregated performance achieved for service delivery
B
Notes:
Both the departments of education and health (constituting about 56% of total city government budget) prepare and publish sex-disaggregated information on the actual performance achieved for service delivery. FY2020 information was published.
GRPFM–6 Tracking budget expenditure for gender equality
D
Notes:
GRPFM–6.1 Tracking budget expenditure for gender equality
D
Notes:
There is currently no tracking of budget expenditure for gender equality. Budget proposals of key spending units do not include expenditure allocations according to gender, nor specific budget policies that would allow traceability of expenditure for gender equality.
GRPFM–7 Gender responsive reporting
D
Notes:
GRPFM–7.1 Gender responsive reporting
D
Notes:
The City Government of Chernivtsi prepares and publishes annual financial reports each year, but the reports do not include specific gender-related expenditure. The reports also do not include the impact of budget policies on gender equality.
GRPFM–8 Evaluation of gender impacts of service delivery
B
Notes:
GRPFM–8.1 Evaluation of gender impacts of service delivery
B
Notes:
The departments of education and culture appear to have taken the lead in evaluating service delivery impact on gender. In FY2020, the two departments, constituting about 56% of the city government total budget, evaluated the efficiency and effectiveness of their service delivery with an impact analysis on both men and women
GRPFM–9 Legislative scrutiny of gender impacts of the budget
D
Notes:
GRPFM–9.1 Gender-responsive legislative scrutiny of budgets
D
Notes:
Since the budget proposals submitted by the city government to legislators have no specific gender-related expenditure policies and proposals, the budget scrutiny is limited to the policies, programmes and expenditure proposals submitted by the city government.
GRPFM–9.2 Gender responsive legislative scrutiny of audit reports
NA
Notes:
This dimension is not applicable; external audit reports are not submitted to the city council (local parliament).