GPRFM Indicators
Scores by Dimension
Overall Indicator Score
GRPFM–1 Gender impact analysis of budget policy proposals
D
Notes:
GRPFM–1.1 Gender impact analysis of expenditure policy proposals
D
Notes:
The government of Zhytomyr city does not analyse the proposed changes to expenditure policies with information that affects both male and female.
GRPFM–1.2 Gender impact analysis of revenue policy proposals
D
Notes:
The government of Zhytomyr city does not analyse the proposed changes of revenue policies with information that has an impact on gender.
GRPFM–2 Gender responsive public investment management
D
Notes:
GRPFM–2.1 Gender responsive public investment management
D
Notes:
Currently, Zhytomyr City Government does not analyse the impact of major public investment projects on gender as part of the economic analyses of investment proposals.
GRPFM–3 Gender responsive budget circular
D
Notes:
GRPFM–3.1 Gender responsive budget circular
D
Notes:
The budget circular issued by the Finance and Budget Department of the Zhytomyr City Council in FY 2020 did not contain any requirement for KSUs to provide information on the on the gender-related impacts of their budget proposals.
GRPFM–4 Gender responsive budget proposal documentation
D
Notes:
GRPFM–4.1 Gender responsive budget proposal documentation
D
Notes:
The City Government’s annual budget documentation as well as medium-term strategic documents do not specifically mention or provide an overview of its policy priorities for improving gender equality.
GRPFM–5 Sex-disaggregated performance information for service delivery
C
Notes:
GRPFM–5.1 Sex-disaggregated performance plans for service delivery
C
Notes:
In 2020, Social Policy Department, Healthcare Department, and Department for Family, Youth and Sports, had a cumulative percentage budget of about 28.5% of total city budget, which provide and publish sex-disaggregated information on planned outputs of service delivery; information for FY2020 is published on Zhytomyr City Council website.
GRPFM–5.2 Sex-disaggregated performance achieved for service delivery
C
Notes:
All three KSUs mentioned above (constituting about 28.5% of total city budget) prepare and publish sex-disaggregated information on actual performance achieved for service delivery. Relevant information for FY2020 is published on Zhytomyr City Council website.
GRPFM–6 Tracking budget expenditure for gender equality
D
Notes:
GRPFM–6.1 Tracking budget expenditure for gender equality
D
Notes:
There is currently no tracking of budget expenditure for gender equality. The budget proposals of key spending units do not include expenditure allocations according to gender, nor specific budget policies that would allow traceability of expenditure for gender equality.
GRPFM–7 Gender responsive reporting
D
Notes:
GRPFM–7.1 Gender responsive reporting
D
Notes:
The City Government of Zhytomyr prepares and publishes budget and financial reports annually, but these reports do not include specific gender-related expenditure and, consequently, cannot present and explain the impact of budget and sectoral policies on gender equality.
GRPFM–8 Evaluation of gender impacts of service delivery
C
Notes:
GRPFM–8.1 Evaluation of gender impacts of service delivery
C
Notes:
The Social Policy Department, Healthcare Department, and Department for Family, Youth and Sports of Zhytomyr City Council conducted gender analysis and evaluation of their budget programs indicated before under GRPFM-5. In FY2020, these three KSUs constituted about 28.5% of total city budget expenditure.
GRPFM–9 Legislative scrutiny of gender impacts of the budget
D
Notes:
GRPFM–9.1 Gender-responsive legislative scrutiny of budgets
D
Notes:
Since the budget proposals submitted by the Executive Committee to the City Council have no specific gender-related expenditure policies and proposals, the budget scrutiny is thus limited to the policies, programmes, and expenditure proposals submitted by the City Government.
GRPFM–9.2 Gender responsive legislative scrutiny of audit reports
NA
Notes:
This dimension is not applicable, since the external audit of local budget execution reports is not required by the legislature. Consequently, audited reports are not submitted to the City Council.